Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 00:54:12 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> Cc: Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Getting rid of pkg-comment (Was: Supporting pkg-plist.gz ?) Message-ID: <20010603005412.F59563@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B19A96D.5806D54C@DougBarton.net>; from DougB@DougBarton.net on Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:05:17PM -0700 References: <20010601225706.A36653@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> <200106021038.f52AcXo50376@mail.uic-in.net> <20010602135045.A682@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> <3B19A96D.5806D54C@DougBarton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--maH1Gajj2nflutpK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:05:17PM -0700, Doug Barton (DougB@DougBarton.net= ) wrote: > I'll repeat this again for fun. The distinfo, pkg-comment AND pkg-descr > funcationality should all be combined into the Makefile. It will address 3 > issues simultaneously. Inode waste, disk space waste, and repo bloat. Take What? Are you for real? Come on now Doug! Think about it. There's no easy way to collapse them all, unless you'd like to take away "make makesum" (and before you say it could be scripted: NO! :-). Though I guess putting DESCR in the Makefile wouldn't be so hard... hmm... --=20 wca --maH1Gajj2nflutpK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7GdEDF47idPgWcsURAjYzAKCYR8vTcddSF9k54i0e29vXV38YOwCfQwF1 LKyKRuZ4V4H57pRek4Ru2fg= =j+2+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --maH1Gajj2nflutpK-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010603005412.F59563>