Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:36:01 +0100 From: Paul Everlund <tdv94ped@cs.umu.se> To: Paulius Bulotas <paulius@kaktusas.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw rules Message-ID: <3C9900C1.DB3A632D@cs.umu.se> References: <3C992774.D763B085@froekjaer.org> <200203201744.15491@silver.dt1.binity.net> <20020320194803.GA88168@kaktusas.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paulius Bulotas wrote: > > On 02 03 20, Walter Hop wrote: > > ipfw add 03300 allow udp from me to 194.109.6.66 53 keep-state via tun0 > > ipfw add 03301 allow udp from me to 194.109.9.99 53 keep-state via tun0 > > possibly I could be wrong, but does udp supports keep-state? udp is > connectionless protocol, as far as I remember ;) so these rules are > wrong (but still could be working, just keep-state is not useful?) Keep state should work, even if it's a connectionless protocol. Setup will on the other hand not work. Keep state checks IP-addresses and ports so therefore it will work even with UDP. Best regards, Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C9900C1.DB3A632D>