Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 23:56:15 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot <herbelot@cybercable.fr> To: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> Cc: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wd0: interrupt timeout (status 58<rdy,seekdone,drq> error 1<no_dam>) Message-ID: <37B09FFF.C6CC6BD5@cybercable.fr> References: <199908102127.XAA55824@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Soren Schmidt wrote: > [SNIP] > > That can't be true, at least not for the IBM DeskStars I own, I've > NEVER EVER seen them do that, one proof should be: same here wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): <IBM-DTTA-350840>, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16 wd0: 8063MB (16514064 sectors), 16383 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S wdc0: unit 1 (wd1): <IBM-DTTA-351010>, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16 wd1: 9671MB (19807200 sectors), 19650 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S wdc1 at 0x170-0x177 irq 15 flags 0xa0ffa0ff on isa wdc1: unit 0 (wd2): <IBM-DTTA-351010>, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16 wd2: 9671MB (19807200 sectors), 19650 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S This is on my (very lightly loaded) home NFS server TfH (trying to upgrade one BP6 to 4.0) > > 11:22PM up 105 days, 4:18, 1 user, load averages: 1.06, 0.94, 0.91 > > dmesg snippet: > wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): <IBM-DTTA-350840>, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16 > wd0: 8063MB (16514064 sectors), 16383 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S > > And none of the other machines I have with semilar or newer IBM's > have ever done this, in fact I've yet to see one of them fail in > any way.. > > -Søren > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37B09FFF.C6CC6BD5>