Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:15:52 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: "."@babolo.ru Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: High ping latency using two ethernet under FreeBSD 4.11 ... Message-ID: <20050316111307.Y92893@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <1110967361.940194.2803.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> References: <1110967361.940194.2803.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 .@babolo.ru wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 .@babolo.ru wrote: >> >>>> but didn't think this was doable ... >>> Why not: >>> ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.2/24 >>> ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.2/24 alias >>> ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.10/32 alias >>> ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.204.5/32 alias >>> ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.254/32 alias >>> ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.251/32 alias >>> ifconfig fxp0 inet 200.46.208.244/32 alias >>> so on >>> ? >>> With the only fxp0 interface >> Great ... I have a new server going down next week that I'll try out the >> ng_fec stuff with, and the above, then ... thanks ... > If addresses and not bandwidth is reason, no need for ng_fec. 'k, I don't think bandwidth is an issue ... just started to use mrtg on the switch, to see what is going on ... I might go with ng_fec anyway, so that both ports are used semi-balanced, since I do have them attached ... Since the servers are remove, can I configure one interface as a fec device, assign its IPs over to it, then "add" the second device? Also, where do you put your start up? SAme as a regular interface, just throw it into a startup.if_fec file or something like that? Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050316111307.Y92893>