Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 01:15:40 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, mike@smith.net.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, rock@cs.uni-sb.de, tlambert@primenet.com Subject: Re: IO performance (UFS read clustering), bad ZIP drive performance Message-ID: <199808041515.BAA10574@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Given that you hold the "depends" criteria, will you be assessing them >and taking the ultimately requisite action, or should I just commit the >patch and wait for your complaint(s) in the hope that they're more >illuminating? The change is in my version so I won't forget about it. You can assess it if you want. Note that it is just a quick (but probably correct) fix for "not mature" support for larger I/O clusters. The problem could also be fixed by initializing d_maxio to nonzero in devswitches for all disk devices. Then the < 0 case would only occur for disk devices that you forgot. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808041515.BAA10574>