Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Aug 2001 15:51:49 -0400
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gif MTU of 1280 ? 
Message-ID:  <5.1.0.14.0.20010808155054.04d25380@marble.sentex.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20010808194325.D1B9E7BB@starfruit.itojun.org>
References:  <asmodai's message of Wed, 08 Aug 2001 18:14:54 %2B0200. <20010808181454.Q2937@daemon.ninth-circle.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:43 AM 8/9/01 +0900, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:

>         as others noted, if you set gif MTU to 1500, then you will see a lot
>         of fragmented packet exchanges (= poor performance).  if you use
>         IPv4 as the outer header, MTU <= 1480 avoids fragmentation and
>         more performant.  as 1280 <= 1480, we avoid fragmentation with the
>         current default configuration.


If the Internal IPs are RFC 1918, will hinder PMTU ?  Am I better off to 
use real ones on the inside ?

         ---Mike


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20010808155054.04d25380>