Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:49:40 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: alpha klds and the new linker Message-ID: <3C754F54.EF691307@mindspring.com> References: <15476.25675.437556.224218@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0202211100090.89657-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> <15477.3715.6908.110667@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From the obvious observation department... > Here is the objdump -p output: [ ... ] > DYNAMIC off 0x000000000000dca8 vaddr 0x000000000001dca8 paddr 0x000000000001dca8 align 2**3 > filesz 0x00000000000000e0 memsz 0x00000000000000e0 flags rw- > > Dynamic Section: > PLTGOT 0x1d328 [ ... ] > DYNAMIC off 0x000000000000d2c8 vaddr 0x000000000001d2c8 paddr 0x000000000001d2c8 align 2**3 > filesz 0x0000000000000130 memsz 0x0000000000000130 flags rw- > > Dynamic Section: > PLTGOT 0x1d3f8 Looks like a bad assumption. Can we just do the calculations, instead of using relative math, and expecting a specific ordering? This seems to have been the problem already with the ld.so bug that was fixed the other week. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C754F54.EF691307>