Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:57:04 -0700
From:      bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
To:        Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Restraining poudriere
Message-ID:  <20210612175704.GC71089@www.zefox.net>
In-Reply-To: <F2BE7E84-8290-443C-8C71-D61095139D14@grem.de>
References:  <20210612172957.GA71089@www.zefox.net> <F2BE7E84-8290-443C-8C71-D61095139D14@grem.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote:
> > 
> > ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to
> > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3.
> > 
> > Can poudriere be configured to tackle packages one at a time?
> 
> Yes, see poudriere.conf:
> 
> # parallel build support.
> #
> # By default poudriere uses hw.ncpu to determine the number of builders.
> # You can override this default by changing PARALLEL_JOBS here, or
> # by specifying the -J flag to bulk/testport.
> #
> # Example to define PARALLEL_JOBS to one single job
> # PARALLEL_JOBS=1
> 
> -m
> 

I perhaps misunderstood what was meant by "builders", confusing it
with threads. Or maybe cores....

Trying it now, hoping to see parallel core use. 

Thanks for writing!

bob prohaska



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210612175704.GC71089>