Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:19:57 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c Message-ID: <XFMail.20030410111957.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030409235243.GI30960@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09-Apr-2003 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> [030409 16:48] wrote: >> >> On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> > > >> > > And what kind of path seperator is '.'? >> > >> > Exactly. What you're describing would be better implemented as a >> > pseudo-fs layer. In fact, that would remove the need for separate j* >> > utilities. >> >> I thought we were trying to get away from synthetic file systems with >> terrible security properties. In fact, we specifically toasted procfs >> because it behaved so badly; kernfs went down the tubes because the >> semantic match was very poor, and sysctl is in. > > Whatever, path components should be path components. You mean like this? > sysctl -N net.inet.tcp.syncache net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit net.inet.tcp.syncache.count net.inet.tcp.syncache.hashsize net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030410111957.jhb>