Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:03:35 +0100 From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists@toco-domains.de> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poudriere Timeout Message-ID: <54BE3607.1010203@toco-domains.de> In-Reply-To: <20150119191834.GH83169@home.opsec.eu> References: <201501190145.t0J1jKvg006268@slippy.cwsent.com> <54BCF7C9.7090502@toco-domains.de> <20150119154822.GX44537@home.opsec.eu> <54BD3203.5050809@toco-domains.de> <20150119191834.GH83169@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, >>>> Yes, i have. I've solved this problem by moving the build-jails of >>>> poudriere to an memory disk. This make poudriere no longer io-bund and >>>> incredibly fast. And solve this issue ;) > >>> How did you do this ? I want to try this myself 8-} > >> I've hacked poudriere to run within a jail. > > Aha, the .m mountpoint. My test host has 32 GB, so 20 GB should not be > a problem. > > Testport: www/p5-Selenium-Remote-Driver on 10.1-amd64, 9.3-amd64 and 8.4-i386. > > Results: > > old: 00:05:43 > new: 00:05:11 I suppose the fetch has to be done? > old: 00:01:56 > new: 00:00:12 > > old: 00:02:11 > new: 00:00:14 > > Nice! You are welcome :) There are a bunch of speed-optimizations possible for poudriere, but this will defeat its general purpose. Using a memory disk is the easiest and fastest way for a big improvement. Greetings, Torsten
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54BE3607.1010203>