Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 23:02:54 -0400 From: =?iso-8859-1?B?QnJ1bm8gTGF1euk=?= <brunolauze@msn.com> To: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: libdevattr Message-ID: <BLU179-W85BEC84BAEF68EEBADF4B8C6F60@phx.gbl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I was looking at dragonfly and why they have libdevattr and we don'tI reall= y think having udev compatible api would open the door to a lot of software= =2C imho.I feel it wouldn't be so complicated to port dragonfly kern_udev= =2C libprop and libdevattr from dragonfly bsd. Am i missing a point or is this in contradiction witch any of freebsd objec= tives? Let me know your thoughts... =
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BLU179-W85BEC84BAEF68EEBADF4B8C6F60>