Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 22:10:32 -0500 From: Jud <jud@operamail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> Subject: Re: Document: 99% (Opera) Message-ID: <09EDNDBF0FDTRLFJIZHCWRVQXVKGEC.3c61f028@sparky> In-Reply-To: <200202062002.g16K2WJ84571@onceler.kciLink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2/6/2002 3:02:32 PM, Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> wrote: [snip] >Why the opera port went to the 6.0-TP series is beyond me -- it should >have stuck with the released version. If anything, an opera-current >or opera-devel port should have been create for this version. Hard to object to having more versions available. However, I'd point out the following: 1. Nothing like this bug (extremely slow image loading, causing some pages to hang for up to several minutes while showing 99% or 100% loaded) has been reported in the opera.linux newsgroup that I've seen, so there was no indication that any such problem would occur with a port. 2. The maintainer says in response to the PR that he's not experiencing the bug (obviously, or I'm sure he wouldn't have released the port), so again, no indication that a problem was likely to occur. 3. The maintainer has a long history of Opera ports, and this is the first time I can recall one with a significant bug not seen in the native Linux version. So the move to TP3 does seem understandable, though as I agreed above, it would be nice to have the earlier port of the released version available as well. Jud To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?09EDNDBF0FDTRLFJIZHCWRVQXVKGEC.3c61f028>