Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:45:01 +0800 From: k simon <chio1990@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Yamagi Burmeister <lists@yamagi.org> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? Message-ID: <543CF09D.8060307@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3B4471A7-CDF4-440D-BDD8-3D5B2256B8DD@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <CAG=rPVe_JGy%2BeUiDjHaXXi5=n2mWGOeZjHkbVeUeS_m1z1_uMg@mail.gmail.com> <20141012182551.002b3cc0a45a56d3f34e6174@yamagi.org> <3B4471A7-CDF4-440D-BDD8-3D5B2256B8DD@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
在 14-10-13 0:38, Bjoern A. Zeeb 写道: > > On 12 Oct 2014, at 16:25 , Yamagi Burmeister <lists@yamagi.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> it's been a while since I tested VIMAGE, but at the last time somewhere >> in 10-CURRENT some UMA memory leaks were left when destroying vnets. >> They weren't showstoppers for most workloads, but pretty anoying... >> Have those been fixed? > > No, an old perforce branch of mine had all but the last TCP ones fixed. The code is still there. > Did you mean it's still leaked with TCP services, eg. HTTP ? Simon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?543CF09D.8060307>