Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Nov 1995 12:43:09 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To:        Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
Cc:        nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), chuckr@glue.umd.edu, FreeBSD-chat@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Gcc-2.7.1
Message-ID:  <199511201943.MAA22329@rocky.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: <199511201813.TAA01580@keltia.freenix.fr>
References:  <199511191621.JAA16061@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199511201813.TAA01580@keltia.freenix.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Nope.  Groff is broken with regards to newer c++ releases because it
> > relies on an older revision of the standard.  You can compile groff by
> > telling it to use the older standard with a flag.
> 
> Except that when I  compiled groff with the  flag, it started to  core dump
> (Sun Sparc under  SunOS 4.1.4)... Anyway, I've  reverted  to 2.6.3  for the
> moment. 

I saw that as well, but the fix for that was something trivial.  It was
so long ago I don't remember anymore, but it wasn't too hard to find.
(I was using SunOS 4.1.3_U1 if it makes any difference)



Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511201943.MAA22329>