Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:45:51 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Alexander N. Kabaev" <ak03@gte.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why special handling of nfsclient kernel support in etc/rc? Message-ID: <3139.1008866751@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:40:51 EST." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011220113821.83441K-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:40:51 EST, Robert Watson wrote: > We need a better general solution for sysctls relating to this, I suspect. Actually, I don't think Alexander's assertion that the manual loading of NFS client support in rc supports sysctl manipulation. Looking at the scripts, sysctl stuff is done in rc.network, but only if the nfs sysctl node exists. It tries to do its own module loading there as well. So I still need an answer back from Doug about this, although your point is valid. I just don't want a discussion on a generalized solution for dynamically loaded sysctls to hijack my question. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3139.1008866751>