Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:54:48 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: How this works... Message-ID: <20030626035448.GA26662@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm not really comfortable about how this whole DNS discussion is going, but I don't know exactly what to do that would fix it and at the same time yield results. Comments (flames) are welcome about: - If the end result (guidelines for dnsadm@) is to be achieved someone needs to write it. I don't mind if that's me but at this point would you prefer it be someone else? - If it is me I could keep my mouth shut and just collect information to assemble but what "drives" the discussion that information gets collected from? - The draft proposal thing was too much to start off the discussion but what should start it off? Jun started it with "We need to come up with a concrete DNS procedure." but the result of that was silence. - Is some (or all) of what got said on the list more appropriately done privately (or not at all?)? - The people most clueful about the way things are currently and what needs to be fixed (if nothing needed to be fixed we'd have nothing that needed to be discussed) are the busiest and hardest to get information from. How does a clueless person go about getting the background info needed to even start (as I said I guessed, probably not the best approach...). Thanx... -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030626035448.GA26662>