Date: 19 Jan 2002 18:48:03 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: mark@grondar.za, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: For all who miss it, PAM changes explanation reposted Message-ID: <xzppu466xm4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020119174339.GG11604@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200201190901.g0J91H641020@freefall.freebsd.org> <xzp1ygm9vc8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020119170316.GA11315@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpit9y8dcg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020119172829.GB11604@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpadva8cy2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020119173633.GD11604@nagual.pp.ru> <20020119174339.GG11604@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > We *ALL* agree that old OPIE scheme with fake promts, in the way it was > implemented, is not improves security. Everybody can detect it trying two > times. Now that you've removed it, they don't even need to try twice. How is that an improvement? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzppu466xm4.fsf>