Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:58:49 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL performance on FreeBSD Message-ID: <lpgit9$okg$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20140627125613.GT93733__16271.4854618118$1403873797$gmane$org@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20140627125613.GT93733__16271.4854618118$1403873797$gmane$org@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --X1RaXo0XW8M5KXax3u3jfpSV4sWvrvig7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/06/2014 14:56, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Hi, > I did some measurements and hacks to see about the performance and > scalability of PostgreSQL 9.3 on FreeBSD, sponsored by The FreeBSD > Foundation. >=20 > The results are described in https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/pgsql_perf.pdf. > The uncommitted patches, referenced in the article, are available as > https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/pig1.patch.txt > https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/patch-2 I'm waiting to upgrade some PostgreSQL machines running FreeBSD 9 to FreeBSD 10 - are the patches committed yet / will they be committed for 10.1? --X1RaXo0XW8M5KXax3u3jfpSV4sWvrvig7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlO7zulfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDYxNDE4MkQ3ODMwNDAwMDJFRUIzNDhFNUZE MDhENTA2M0RGRjFEMkMACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSzxCQCdEu8ZPkOzLxRMU+hHnbP9nhIo Eh8AoIzUZAU1eNuiVNjgL5qg3eAbc6si =4Iff -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1RaXo0XW8M5KXax3u3jfpSV4sWvrvig7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lpgit9$okg$1>