Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Mar 2001 13:22:54 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>
Cc:        Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, kris@obsecurity.org, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: -march considered harmful? (Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults make.conf)
Message-ID:  <20010308132254.B88665@mollari.cthul.hu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0103081314590.34818-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us>; from cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us on Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:26:58PM -0600
References:  <20010308102441.B7727@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <Pine.BSF.4.32.0103081314590.34818-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:26:58PM -0600, Chris Dillon wrote:

> In the same vein, can -march=pentiumpro hurt performance for P5 class
> CPUs, or even cause the code not to work at all (unsupported
> instructions)?

Yes, -march=pentiumpro will generate code that doesn't run on
pentiums.

Kris

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6p/gsWry0BWjoQKURAlOOAJ49m6vKlsJ627ebBJ1hAiqJEToKxgCdEpN3
+MnOgW3nmIAaMGuYJU9FOCM=
=zlWB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010308132254.B88665>