Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:39:44 +0200 From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-doc-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: ceee1def00 - main - articles/committers-guide: Document change in MFH policy Message-ID: <3252cd06-4140-0bc2-e958-983b4a2453c2@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20210420122849.rh5v2kohzvkxs4uu@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <202104201032.13KAWNFn016258@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20210420122849.rh5v2kohzvkxs4uu@aching.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/04/2021 14:28, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:32:23AM +0000, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: >> The branch main has been updated by 0mp: >> >> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/doc/commit/?id=ceee1def00ac69f06b9d86b2fb1ff04bb6c84d48 >> >> commit ceee1def00ac69f06b9d86b2fb1ff04bb6c84d48 >> Author: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> >> AuthorDate: 2021-04-20 10:14:58 +0000 >> Commit: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> >> CommitDate: 2021-04-20 10:14:58 +0000 >> >> articles/committers-guide: Document change in MFH policy >> >> Merging commits into the quarterly branch no longer requires an explicit >> approval [1]. Let's remove outdated documentation and leave a note >> explaining that there is no need for an explicit approval to MFH. > Note that the MFH line should still be used to note intent. Hmm, true. It does make sense to leave MFH in the table of metadata fields for this use case. I'll bring back the MFH entry with an updated definition.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3252cd06-4140-0bc2-e958-983b4a2453c2>