Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 19:40:21 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Wendy Germond <wgermond@dttus.com> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG (IPM Return requested) Subject: Re: Year 2000 Compliancy Message-ID: <21438.897414021@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "09 Jun 1998 09:35:34 CDT." <08AF0357D48360CB*/c=US/admd=TeleMail/prmd=Deloitte/o=ccMailGW/s=Germond/g=Wendy/i=A/@MHS>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Wendy, > Good Morning -- > > I have found the Year 2000 compliancy statement at the following > website: > > www.freebsd.org/y2kbug.html > > Does this statement hold true for all of the following versions of > Free BSD: 2.0, 2.1.5, 2.2, and 2.2.5? There are no longer any active development for releases on the 2.0 and 2.1 branches, and if any y2k bugs are found, I doubt they will be fixed in these releases, although the patches used to fix it in the 2.2 and 3.0 branches will in all likelihood apply for the earlier releases as well. Our current release on the 2.2 branch is 2.2.6, with 2.2.7 and possibly 2.2.8 planned in the future. These three releases are pretty certain to receive any y2k fixes we find. 3.0 is our current development branch and all patches (y2k or not) goes into this branch. Summary: any release before 2.2.6 should be upgraded to 2.2.6 or later no only because of y2k issues, but also stability, security and good ol' plain bugfixing. I hope this answers you question... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21438.897414021>