Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Aug 2016 00:45:31 +1000 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>,  Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>,  src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>,  John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>,  "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>,  "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>,  Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r304187 - in head: . share/man/man4 sys/conf sys/dev/mcd sys/modules sys/modules/mcd
Message-ID:  <20160820000234.W3223@besplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160819133915.GA8791@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201608152038.u7FKc2NL026330@repo.freebsd.org> <2065331.KaGOSftJhd@ralph.baldwin.cx> <0d6c2e45-e4da-9bb7-a50c-212135d9ac4f@freebsd.org> <CANCZdfpY9S8ErwD6b7pHeH%2BRVF9JEszBb7zJ9m-wybfBr1ujAg@mail.gmail.com> <20160819073955.GC83214@kib.kiev.ua> <20160819202010.Y2407@besplex.bde.org> <20160819133915.GA8791@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:12:53PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>> I normally use my version of biosboot for boot2.  I improved its caching
>> just a couple of years ago.  It was using 9K buffer optimized for 1440K
>> floppies.  Now it uses a 32K buffer.  Booting a 5.5MB kernel takes a
>> fraction of a second.
>
> That looks like change that everyone would benefit from.  Consider posting
> a patch or committing it yourself. ;-)

Oops, it is actually loading that takes a fraction of a second.  Not
much different than with -current boot2 or old loader.  -current boot2
also works for me, but I managed to squeeze more of the features that
I want into biosboot (everything except ufs2).  Booting from the boot1
prompt takes 20-25 seconds here.

>> Of course I don't use modules, so not many seeks are needed.
>
> Why not, they're convenient (apart from "kernel version mismatch" crap
> that I keep hitting now and then)?  AFAIR they were slow to load at some
> point but that was (not so) recently fixed.

Same reason that I don't use shared libraries if possible - they are
larger, slower and more difficult to debug.  For kernel development,
the version control problem is large.  Modules are good for avoiding
rebooting when developing something in a single module, but I usually
work on either small changes that panic often or system wide-changes
that need recompiling everything.  Both require rebooting a lot to
test, and I can rebuild a kernel and without modules and reboot it
almost faster than I can remember where the modules directories are.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160820000234.W3223>