Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 21:15:06 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Moving the generation of foodevs.h to build time Message-ID: <20030516041506.GA82545@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030515.220304.68038616.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20030513.001815.55840081.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030516031317.GC38966@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030515.220304.68038616.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:03:04PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20030516031317.GC38966@dragon.nuxi.com>
> "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> writes:
> : On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:18:15AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > OK. Here's a start at moving it. First, we have to move
> : > devlist2h.awk out of tools back to dev/mii/devlist2h.awk. It
> : > shouldn't be in tool if it only generates MII code,
> :
> : Why shouldn't it be a tool if it only generates MII code?
> : Can't we just rename all the devlist2h.awk's to
> : @/tools/${_dev}-devlist2h.awk?
>
> I can paint this bikeshed either way. tools/devlist2h.awk isn't the
> right name/place for it. I don't care if we do a
> ${_dev}-devlist2h.awk or dev/${_dev}/devlist2h.awk. Arguments can be
> made either way.
Should we commit this patch (in some form) for 5.1 or after 5.1?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030516041506.GA82545>