Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:14:56 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: kde@freebsd.org Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] KDE checks for xscreensaver-gnome in wrong place Message-ID: <200503261115.00695.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <4244C7C8.60307@magnesium.net> References: <4244C7C8.60307@magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1576221.N74eJI01r6
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Saturday, 26. March 2005 03:24, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Furthermore, the logic in kdeartwork3 seems a little weird. It checks to
> see whether xscreesaver or xscreensaver-gnome is installed, and then
> does the same thing in both cases. Is this intentional?
Yes. The goal is to register the dependency on xscreensaver-gnome if it is=
=20
there.
> > ${X11BASE}/share/gnome/applications/gnome-screensaver-properties.desktop
> > as an additional file to check.
>=20
> Would such a change be admissible for 5.4?
I don't see why checking for two files is better than checking for one, as=
=20
long as the one checked for is unique to the port. Feel free to change the=
=20
dependency file once the xscreensaver-gnome update goes in, but please keep=
=20
it to one file.
=2D-=20
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
--nextPart1576221.N74eJI01r6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCRTYkXhc68WspdLARAsqBAJ9xQJ+n1VIpo/rWBE10OGgaoNNvqQCfT9L7
Xufr5lokzCtTNcqxaufbb/Y=
=iXNg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1576221.N74eJI01r6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503261115.00695.michaelnottebrock>