Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 17:41:45 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: khansen@njcc.com Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is anyone working on xircom pccard support? (sort of...) Message-ID: <199804202341.RAA03302@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <353BC1D1.2AD2@njcc.com> References: <199804201744.NAA23322@tuva.engeast.baynetworks.com> <199804201913.NAA01925@mt.sri.com> <353BC1D1.2AD2@njcc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I am close to instaling NetBSD on a "palmtop" (Toshiba > Libretto) and I was told that I should use the PAO (distribution?) > software, but based on what I infer from the following, it seems > that the differences between R2.2.6 and PAO are minimal - is that > true? I have no idea what's in NetBSD. If you meant to say FreeBSD, then the differences between 2.2.6 and PAO are not minimal in my eyes, but I'm biased. > I am concerned about typical laptop things (power, limited > display, etc) - is R2.2.6 a reasonable relase for such a platform? I believe Warner Losh uses FreeBSD on them right now, and I had one working for a very short period of time. They seem to work fine under FreeBSD. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804202341.RAA03302>