Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:36:41 +0100 (MET)
From:      Werner Griessl <werner@btp1da.phy.uni-bayreuth.de>
To:        John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "Viren R. Shah" <viren@rstcorp.com>, Yuri Gindin <yuri@xpert.com>
Subject:   Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server
Message-ID:  <XFMail.980226143641.werner@btp1da.phy.uni-bayreuth.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980226081649.3416K-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 26-Feb-98 John Fieber wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 1998, Yuri Gindin wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, John Fieber wrote:
>> > Depends on your clients.  For 2.2.5, I can confirm that Solaris
>> > and Digital Unix clients do NOT work using nfs v3.  Digital Unix
>> > works fine if you specify v2 when mounting.  Telling FreeBSD
>> > mountd to only accept v2 does not seem to allow mounts from
>> > Solaris clients using their automounter (I'm not the admin of the
>> > Solaris boxes in question so I can't do much more investigation.)
>> > 
>> Don't know about Dunix but solaris-2.6 works.
> 
> ...version check...The solaris boxes I have trouble with are
> 2.5.1. The DEC boxes with trouble report "OSF1 zinc V4.0 564
> alpha". 
> 
> -john
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

----------------------------------
E-Mail: Werner Griessl <werner@btp1da.phy.uni-bayreuth.de>
Date: 26-Feb-98
Time: 14:33:49

This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------

Have no problem here with "OSF1  V4.0 564.32 alpha" and nfs v2,
but nfs v3 is not stable !

Werner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.980226143641.werner>