Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 11:16:44 -0700 (MST) From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca> To: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: preferred www.freebsd.org mirror method Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902201113220.48537-100000@thingfish.v-wave.com> In-Reply-To: <199902200705.SAA07535@henry.cs.adfa.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm using compressed rsync, which is great. > > Thinks: I should set up cvsup to another area on the disk, and then > compare the two methods, to work out which gives the least amount > of network traffic for a mirror. I'm curious about this, too. We're using rsync on www.ca.freebsd.org, and that's what I tried first for ww3.ca, however the current rsync in the ports tree doesn't seem to work the same way. On www.ca we're running 'rsync --client -avz ...', but the current rsync (from ports) doesn't recognize --client. I haven't had time to dig in and see what's changed. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902201113220.48537-100000>