Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:28:23 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Volker <volker@vwsoft.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: fixing IRQ storms Message-ID: <200704061228.l36CSJ8Z064543@lava.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <46163987.4010409@vwsoft.com> References: <7.1.0.9.0.20070405163059.16b8a220@sentex.net> <200704061130.l36BUtjW064328@lava.sentex.ca> <46163987.4010409@vwsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:13 AM 4/6/2007, Volker wrote: >Mike, > >have a look at GNAT: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=51982 > >You need to patch your kernel sources a bit (all info in the PR) and >your silo overflows will be gone. I've done that to get a Merlin >U630 working (w/o patching sio.c the card was almost unusable). Hi, Thanks for the note. Actually, I have done this in the past (I am even in the above PR :)), but I had found using the UART driver instead of sio was better for working around such issues on the whole. The overflow rate is so high in the case, even increasing the ticks by 10 doesnt seem to fix the issue. It seems to reduce the overflows a bit, but nowhere nearly enough sio2: 108 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 108) sio2: 81 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 189) sio2: 108 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 297) sio2: 81 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 378) sio2: 33 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 411) sio2: 76 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 487) With the uart driver, I am able to talk to the modem OK, but the cpu is really high dealing with all those interrupts. I was hoping I could just tell the card to use a different interrupt like 5 which is available, but I dont know how to do that, or if its even possible. ---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704061228.l36CSJ8Z064543>