Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:26:38 -0500 From: Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187132 - head/usr.bin/make Message-ID: <p06240801c5a965e57c2d@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20090130.105746.-1582160580.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20090130015518.GA20404@hades.panopticon> <20090130.085130.-4349483.imp@bsdimp.com> <20090130173956.GA9119@dragon.NUXI.org> <20090130.105746.-1582160580.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:57 AM -0700 1/30/09, M. Warner Losh wrote: >In message: <20090130173956.GA9119@dragon.NUXI.org> > "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes: >: >: 100,000 of things change within FreeBSD without discission that >: displeases some set of folks. That's nothing new, but I'm >: restoring compatibility and functionailty, not removing it. > >Don't you have any ability to judge that this might be a bad thing? >So far the voting I solicited is 100% in favor of getting rid of what >you did... Usually that implies it is a bad commit... In case someone is collecting votes, I'd also vote against the extra output. The sad thing is that somewhere I have changes to 'make' which added debugging option that helped a lot with parallel builds. One big difference was that it was an option, which could be turned on via some environment variable or something. I haven't the faintest idea what I did with that change though. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosehn@rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06240801c5a965e57c2d>