Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:31:05 -0800 (PST)
From:      Jordan Krushen <wired@purplemedia.com>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: rpc.lockd
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.981119103053.23395A-100000@pc-37001.bc.rogers.wave.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9811190941060.2017-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK, then can someone point me to a better solution? ;)

On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, Doug White wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Jordan Krushen wrote:
> 
> > I've noticed in rc.conf that lockd is 'broken', and in reading the man
> > pages, I'm told that it's only broken when the NFS client is a FreeBSD box
> > as well.  What I have is a scenario where a windows app (which uses
> > file/record locking across its filesystem) exists at two remote locations,
> > and we have a FreeBSD box at each site.  I was thinking of mounting each
> > other's filesystems with NFS and then sharing those with Samba, but I take
> > it the locking won't work correctly.  Would simply running a Windows NFS
> > client on the workstations, running through the BSD gateway, solve the
> > problem?
> 
> Any sort of file locking on NFS should not be depended on.  There is no
> documented standard for handling the protocol.
> 
> Doug White                               
> Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
> http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | www.freebsd.org
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.981119103053.23395A-100000>