Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:55:52 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> To: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re[2]: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem) Message-ID: <1176299575.20051110155552@rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420511100647h5fbc1946n88f3fac1e449e758@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA513920FC73A14B964AB258D77EA8D60B559A@mx1.masongeneral.com> <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> <43725078.6000303@freebsd.org> <cb5206420511100647h5fbc1946n88f3fac1e449e758@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. ------------661C921A37A90064 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Szia Andrew, Thursday, November 10, 2005, 3:47:32 PM, you wrote: > There are a couple more points against portsnap: > - it lags behind by a few hours. Actually, even cvsup is behind by a few hours, if you are not syncing agains cvsup-master (to which only official cvsup mirrors have access, and maybe even not all of them :)) so it depends on how often is your cvsup-mirror beeing sinced. > - setting up a mirror is still undocumented --=20 Sincerely, Daniel Gerzo ------------661C921A37A90064--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1176299575.20051110155552>