Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 11:59:55 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version Resolution? Message-ID: <199711221859.LAA18715@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199711220157.RAA16344@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> References: <nate@mt.sri.com> <199711220157.RAA16344@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> } > If you use "-r <branch_tag>:<date>", the most recent timestamp in the > } > history file that is older than "<date>" should be used. > } > } Huh? "-r <BT>:<date?" doesn't work in CVS. I consider this a bug, but > } in any case... > > In my somewhat dated copy of the CVS FAQ I've seen this referred to as > both "-r <BT>:<date>" and "-D <BT>:<date>", the latter of which > wouldn't be usable with export. This 'never worked', and is why the CVS maintainers no longer distribute the FAQ.:( Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711221859.LAA18715>