Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Jan 2000 13:16:07 -0500 (EST)
From:      Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net>
To:        Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FFS vs ext2fs (Was: Re: Not enough information)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001061314230.27160-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001061452580.66464-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Backup. Backup. Backup. Backup. Backup.

Backup.  Test restoring.


ps.  Did I mention making backups? :-)


On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:

>
>On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote:
>
>>> Recently FreeBSD's not so great filesystem got corrupted. Guess what got damaged? Package information, so now I can't get any information on installed packages.UPgrading ports, I mean installed ports? Probably the only point its got going 
>>
>>Bullsh*t!  FFS totally outperforms ext2fs, and I've never heard any
>>opposite statements.
>
>Actually, once i made a mistake and ruined /var, including the package db,
>and it screwed my system.  I had no idea how to fix the packages.  But
>this was my fault.  However, a way of recovering without reinstalling
>would have been nice.
>
>-=> jm <=-
>
>
>
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001061314230.27160-100000>