Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:16:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at> To: Paul <paul@gtcomm.net> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp] Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806300214210.10999@filebunker.xip.at> In-Reply-To: <48681A3D.9040509@gtcomm.net> References: <4867420D.7090406@gtcomm.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806291255480.7208@filebunker.xip.at> <4867A9A1.9070507@gtcomm.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806300105170.10999@filebunker.xip.at> <48681A3D.9040509@gtcomm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Paul, > Yes it does but it seems to use a lot more of one cpu than the others so It's > really not SMP.. Can I stop it from doing this with some setting? > Why can't there be 4 taskq's? it is possible, but it need to be coded. hz 4000 is also too high, use 1000-2000 http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html > Also with full internet table I can't even do 100kpps without errors.. I > don't get it :/ I could do 300kpps on a p3 and now I have a 3ghz xeon and > 2.2ghz opteron brand new hardware and can barely get more than that.. > Doesn't make sense to me. have you tested with freebsd 6? or try dragonfly? Kind regards, Ingo Flaschberger
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LFD.1.10.0806300214210.10999>