Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:06:00 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.ORG>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include Makefile spawn.h unistd.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map exec.3 exec.c posix_spawn.c Message-ID: <20080617140600.GE1176@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080617134828.GA30076@zim.MIT.EDU> References: <200806170633.m5H6XMJH084600@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080617134828.GA30076@zim.MIT.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9G1N7tM9L3K453BF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: > I have no objections to this, but doesn't it defeat the whole > purpose to implement posix_spawn() as a library function that just > calls fork/exec? When (if?) applications start to use posix_spawn() we may decide to move it into the kernel at any time. It should be okay for now. --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --9G1N7tM9L3K453BF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhXxMgACgkQ52SDGA2eCwXadgCeLadBjw6fPfRjF5LS0JEgOSuC T9oAn1LiYAvUNmoJPQQp78njzd30v4CZ =e0Nf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9G1N7tM9L3K453BF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080617140600.GE1176>