Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:26:28 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: For all who miss it, PAM changes explanation reposted Message-ID: <20020119182627.GN11604@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpvgdy5ho1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20020119175230.GI11604@nagual.pp.ru> <200201191801.g0JI1Ot23104@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20020119181345.GK11604@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpvgdy5ho1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 19:17:50 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > > Patches already sent out. Explanations already sent out. > > I've already made it amply clear that your explanation was lacking, > and told you exactly what I wanted to know. However, it seems you're > only interested in arguing, rather than finding a constructive > solution to this issue. Sayng "we don't understand this", on every my message, isn't a simple trick? If you don't understand something, questions should arise, so please ask them in detailed form and I comment every technical phrase. Please not say something like "read docs", it is totally non-informative. What docs? Which place in the docs exactly? Which part of my explanation exactly cause "read docs" reaction? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020119182627.GN11604>