Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 10:13:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@ice.cold.org> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Why routed and not gated by default? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970602100912.7687A-100000@ice.cold.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just curious, why do we still have the antiquated routed as our default router daemon? It only does RIP doesn't it? My general and limited experience (I've only setup two ISPs) has been that most people disabled RIP by default in their routers (if its enabled at all)--which causes no end of headaches. Why don't we just let RIP die and use something more modern and better, such as gated, which can still do RIP if you want it, but also handles the more modern protocols. Basically, RIP is ok for local networks, but isn't FreeBSD supposed to be sortof a server/higher-end system? This being the case, shouldn't we at least support the more commonly used protocols by routers? Its been too long since I setup the last network, so I've forgotten the acronym, but the more common protocol seemed to be OSPF? *shrug* Perhaps we don't use gated by default due to copyright problems? -Brandon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.970602100912.7687A-100000>