Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:26:23 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias <sonic2000gr@gmail.com> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, cwhiteh@onetel.com Subject: Re: openoffice.org-3.01 packages available (i386) Message-ID: <49E10AFF.3040700@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49e10033.nranDPhLy%2BBjn3ry%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <49DBCB82.2090903@gmail.com> <4ad871310904071653hef9da1br6048618d4676d658@mail.gmail.com> <49DFE46A.2080600@onetel.com> <49E09FB5.6050803@gmail.com> <49e10033.nranDPhLy%2BBjn3ry%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Manolis Kiagias <sonic2000gr@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I could also distribute the ports tree ... >> > > I wonder if it's necessary to distribute the entire ports tree. > Perhaps it would suffice to distribute a timestamp for csup/cvsup > to retrieve the appropriate version. > > Yes, this is probably correct :) However distributing a compressed ports tree in the CD (without the distfiles) won't be much of a problem space-wise.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E10AFF.3040700>