Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 17:39:12 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>, Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980117173426.6782A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <19980117152958.42977@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 17 Jan 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > I talk about not yet released -stable, not about older 2.2 installations > > which have their own patch / bsd.port.mk > > No. They don't have their own bsd.port.mk - we've been telling them > to upgrade to the newest bsd.port.mk all the time. IMHO, we should as > far as possible in making the active ports collection work on all > versions of 2.2 (or at least provide a painless way of making it > work). Well, personally I don't deal with 2.2 so can't know all pitfails there. What I want initially was fixing -current bsd.port.mk only. >From the picture you show I see that we need different bsd.port.mk in -current and -stable, or runtime check in bsd.port.mk which can cause slowdown (maybe not so big) -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980117173426.6782A-100000>