Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:39:20 -0500 From: Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CEPH + FreeBSD Message-ID: <55F03688.6060407@physics.umn.edu> In-Reply-To: <488408636.4345946.1441801224232.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> References: <CANw0z%2BVhYCPNWrjByXLf8yO9wA0sc05_8eVJsM-McjcGNU9KQg@mail.gmail.com> <CANw0z%2BXrwK=6y%2BLpoiewc_eLDBYB5UZ5XpU6-YP0-K2FKwSa5w@mail.gmail.com> <A19FDEB5-1DEF-4EBF-8E9E-A1AD4688F1AA@icloud.com> <100306673.40344407.1441279047901.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <1564D4FA-9BE1-4E37-8E91-F14A009D6B62@icloud.com> <838814506.1858817.1441577912291.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <F5F89A87-AD10-4CD3-BF56-854EEBB4C121@longcount.org> <CAKYr3zyPxM0oKhgsNoFmkFxn6AFkekS2=ptV7Z6CicTzZvXCdw@mail.gmail.com> <488408636.4345946.1441801224232.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/9/2015 7:20 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > If there are yet more of these cluster object stores that you think might be worth > considering, feel free to mention them. (I thought I had looked at most of them, but > hadn't noticed MooseFS, so...) Not adding anything new, but I found this an interesting paper comparing some of the contenders. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00789086/document I felt glusterfs seems like it would be the fastest and easiest to get up and running (at least on linux). Graham
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55F03688.6060407>