Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 19:57:45 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> Cc: blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com>, "freebsd-multimedia\@freebsd.org" <freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD amd64 GENERIC kernel Message-ID: <po7f-hl92-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <82f7f862-d44e-4553-50d0-ed5b4c9c0182@selasky.org> (Hans Petter Selasky's message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2017 19:42:22 %2B0100") References: <CALM2mEnnXKAyF_ti_zKYt=1m-ZTfjH5di1cayYjGM4hi9dOxRQ@mail.gmail.com> <aa346744-94c9-98a4-4de6-c5e956bf096c@ShaneWare.Biz> <CALM2mE=88_a-9FF3-e49TMPm1pGzwQn1h_wx2gofHK-NRKOpZA@mail.gmail.com> <cf0b39a9-8059-06c2-a033-109c626de225@selasky.org> <CALM2mEnfdv6R4YuSMSnR-SEtR1ief5uSg4qYWFb49dVQsRMw6A@mail.gmail.com> <ad2778be-a601-b825-1195-134dd02b04d9@selasky.org> <CALM2mEkKUr%2BrbMtS_ObXq0SYvZgFUKN9VXwqV-bxFrWVfizx1Q@mail.gmail.com> <4c3ae20e-b6dd-d5db-0b93-2e1225daa658@selasky.org> <CALM2mEkedLN%2Br2fk4YX3_Y01ENgvqo4s9yoyfBKTkBJkH56dcQ@mail.gmail.com> <4eb0c57e-96fa-b75a-17f8-750154aa247a@selasky.org> <CALM2mEn=9eNHzezpkKSBydKzedqagLwtfMopuDQb9Xem7=OGUA@mail.gmail.com> <d92eae76-831b-3a6f-a7a6-4f4d7e66df99@selasky.org> <CALM2mEmnxsdwy5rr9ApC3q7kZ2-EK2YYBqMAibd9nA3XRfhKhQ@mail.gmail.com> <82f7f862-d44e-4553-50d0-ed5b4c9c0182@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> writes: > On 12/15/17 15:39, blubee blubeeme wrote: >> What's with the stuck up attitude? Stay focused on the issue at hand which >> is FreeBSD's fork of OSS makes it a challenge to implement software that >> sticks to the OSS standard. > > Can you give a reference to the claim FreeBSD's OSSv4 is a fork of > 4Front's OSS? Sorry, probably me. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-December/111382.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?po7f-hl92-wny>