Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Dec 2007 05:55:31 -0500
From:      "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [RFC/P] Port System Re-Engineering
Message-ID:  <47528F23.4040409@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4752827F.20902@gmail.com>
References:  <4752827F.20902@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>
>
> 7. Same as question 6 but for your answer on question 3?
>
Several people said the wording was bad so here is the reworded question:

7. If a new system broke the best aspects of the current ports system
would you use the new or old system?
- --
Aryeh M. Friedman
FloSoft Systems
Developer, not business, friendly
http://www.flosoft-systems.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHUo8i358R5LPuPvsRAihEAKCODsX8kX+lgQ5QfDbaM6VsyoIOqQCeOl8Z
E/kabmFPhpeQpoZT6KD1hao=
=n65u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47528F23.4040409>