Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:41:05 +0000 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upstream chromium versions bumped Message-ID: <AANLkTimR5Q=hfMHtDtrfmaRoBF1wFZ2OOzU-EvQYhVWT@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinN11LuMVHcEDHcsYr1%2BTxvcrprSBXbrnSF2LXp@mail.gmail.com> References: <4D5F90BA.6080205@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinN11LuMVHcEDHcsYr1%2BTxvcrprSBXbrnSF2LXp@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/2/19 Ren=E9 Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>: > 2011/2/19 Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>: >> Hi, >> >> as you can read at http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/ , >> Chromium Beta is now 10.0.648.82 and Chromium Dev is 11.0.672.2. >> I'll probably sync the chromium-devel port to Dev in a few days for >> better upstream compatibility, unless somebody objects. >> > Or maybe rename chromium-devel to chromium-beta and make a > chromium-devel port for 11. =A0This way no work would be lost when > stable moves to 10. > > Ren=E9 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chromium > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chromium-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > I think having chromium (the stable one that should in the end be in ports) chromium-beta (the next one) and chromium-devel is the best solution (but needs more time). regards, Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimR5Q=hfMHtDtrfmaRoBF1wFZ2OOzU-EvQYhVWT>