Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Jun 1999 22:26:16 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FS tuning (Was: File system gets too fragmented ???)
Message-ID:  <375D19F8.39C6F771@newsguy.com>
References:  <199905271415.HAA10721@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> <86lne8h3gj.fsf@detlev.UUCP> <xzpg14g0wmk.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> 
> No, I don't think there's much point in doing that before Kirk
> McKusick removes the restrictions on the soft updates code. When that
> happens, we can make soft updates non-optional and turn on soft
> updates on all file systems by default.

I hope *that* doesn't happen, unless the free space problem is
corrected first.

--
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

	"definition of an expert: X means experimental and a spurt is a
drip under pressure."




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?375D19F8.39C6F771>