Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 19:39:55 +0200 From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, nectar@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re[2]: openssh OR openssh-portable Message-ID: <6WBaUgg1nC@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <xzpsn33h5uk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3D1AD7C4.9020909@cerint.pl> <xzp6604x5ue.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <41256714305.20020627163946@datafull.com> <xzpbs9wv172.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020701143038.GM4764@madman.nectar.cc> <xzpsn33h5uk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020701144043.GQ4764@madman.nectar.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > > > Of course, OpenSSH 3.4 is always available via the Ports Collection, > > > and I would, in fact, recommend that users take advantage of it and > > > turn on PrivilegeSeperation if at all possible. > > > > I wouldn't - the port needs quite a bit of work and is too much of a > > moving target right now :( > > I'll have us agree by defining `if at all possible' to include a stable, > working OpenSSH port :-) > > I'm sure Dirk is ready and willing to fix any problems that crop up. > I think that the port currently provides the functionality needed by a > large cross-section of users. Sure, if you find any problem, let me know. I try to sync my patches with current, But I can't test all configurations/options. I think I need a testbed / regression test, where we can test at least the FreeBSD extensions to work as expected. Anything urgen functions needed we might copy from cvs and add as pacthes to teh ports. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6WBaUgg1nC>