Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 01:54:52 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: sos@sos.freebsd.dk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: siginterrupt (was Re: Error in sleep !) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970813014952.331A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199708122135.OAA07747@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Type "man siginterrupt". > > > > > > Hmm, then that man page is in error too in -current :( > > > > This man page have nothing common with sleep signals interruption which > > directly required by POSIX in any case. Also all this stuff have no relations with sleep(3), one thing is unclear to me: > By default, in traditional BSD, after a signal, the call was > restarted. > > This man page is incorrect about the default for FreeBSD; so > is the signal man page. As I check, man page says that it will be restarted for FreeBSD too. What is incorrect here? I just check signal.c and see that SA_RESTART is set unless expicitly disabled by siginterrupt(3)... -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970813014952.331A-100000>