Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 19:11:14 -0700 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: sef@Kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan), current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent vfork kernel changes broke csh & tcsh! Message-ID: <199704230211.TAA00458@root.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Apr 1997 19:24:54 CDT." <199704230024.TAA02998@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >> Am I the only one who thinks that restoring behaviour known to be a defect >> in the original implementation is a BAD idea? >> >I don't think that you are the only one. However, it makes a difference >of about 3mins out of 1:51 for make world. > >I am backing it out anyway. Perhaps rfork() should be called directly instead in areas where it is known to be safe (certain shells, etc). -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704230211.TAA00458>