Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:25:19 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness Message-ID: <20031113162411.H10222-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <200311130728.02722@harrymail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc: > > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer <news@schmalzbauer.de> wrote: > > >> Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not neccessary > > >> at all. I built a UP kernel with ULE like Kris advised me. > > > > > > Are you running an up-to-date 5.1-CURRENT? ULE was broken with these > > > characteristics until very recently. If you're up-to-date and still > > > see these problems, you need to post to the current mailing list. > > > > > > Kris > > > > Yes, I am running current as of 13. Nov. > > > > Find attached my first problem description. > > This time I also attached my dmesg and kernel conf Try running seti with nice +20 rather than 15. Do you experience bad interactivity without seti running? Thanks, Jeff > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Harry >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031113162411.H10222-100000>