Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:02:31 -0500
From:      george donnelly <list@zettai.net>
To:        Benjamin Walkenhorst <krylon@gmx.net>, FreeBSD Q's <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: emacs - gnu, x ...?
Message-ID:  <BB4F1847.3AA64%list@zettai.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Benjamin Walkenhorst wrote (krylon@gmx.net) on 7/31/03 6:44 PM]

> If you want a GUI, try GNU Emacs or XEmacs. I prefer GNU Emacs, but I sug=
gest
> you try both (if you are looking for a GUI).
> If you don't want a GUI, and if you are not looking for Emacs' massive
> extensibility, there are several curses-based "lookalikes" of Emacs, that
> share Emacs' look and feel, but do not feature its lisp interpreter, and =
thus
> much of its extensibility; on the other hand, they tend be more...
> ressource-friendly than emacs. Among these smaller versions I know of zil=
e
> (zile is lossy emacs) and =B5emacs (micro emacs), though I have tried neith=
er.

thanks for the feedback. gui is not important, i guess i'm just looking for
the neat features that everyone talks about - and with a minimum of resourc=
e
usage as i would like to install it on a webserver as well so clients can
use it over ssh.

<-->
george donnelly ~ http://www.zettai.net/ ~ "Quality Zope Hosting"
Shared and Dedicated Zope Hosting ~ Zope Servers ~ Zope Websites
Yahoo, AIM: zettainet ~ MSN: zettainet@hotmail.com ~ ICQ: 51907738



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BB4F1847.3AA64%list>