Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 22:18:31 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libh src/ import Message-ID: <20010906221831.A7899@coffee.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010906120537.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:05:37PM -0700 References: <20010906023247.A11776@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <XFMail.010906120537.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > On 06-Sep-01 Alexander Langer wrote: > > Hi! > > > > How are peoples feelings about an import of libh into our src tree, > > in order to push the development? > > As I said on IRC in an opinion that no one else seems to share, libh is useful > in a wider regard than just FreeBSD, and I think it should be a separate > project that gets vendor imported into src/contrib. Let's face it guys, > FreeBSD doesn't have a lot of GUI people running around, and if libh is going > to fly, it needs developers. IMHO, the best way to get developers for it is to > not make it look like some FreeBSD-only thing, but instead to make it inviting > to other developers. [snip] FreeBSD is more than just a kernel, you know. I don't think we should artificially limit ourselves by your imagination. Obviously Alex wants to get libh to work as FreeBSD's installer before meeting the world's needs, so I think a fully intregrated (lib, usr.sbin) approach is probably best. If at a latter time, Alex feels libh's goals would be better served outside the resources of the FreeBSD project, we can certainly start vendor importing it then. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010906221831.A7899>